Analyze
Images go through applicable integrity, metadata, visual-similarity, and structural routines.
Technical photographic-authenticity analysis
TraceDocket applies integrity, metadata, structure, compression, and similarity analysis to support a technical evaluation of a photograph's legitimacy in legal contexts.
Technical indicators support authenticity and integrity review. No single test determines whether a photograph is authentic or sufficient for a legal matter.
Authenticity under review
technical signals evaluated by multiple routines
Interpretable result
findings and limits in clear language
Protected record
online reference linked to the analysis
From analysis to decision
The document is the output of a technical process. First the platform analyzes the file; then it turns the findings into communication a legal team can review and reference.
Images go through applicable integrity, metadata, visual-similarity, and structural routines.
Signals are translated into clear, cautious language for legal or expert review.
Report, batch, hashes, and export event remain connected to the analysis record.
Complete workflow
TraceDocket reduces manual work without hiding what was analyzed.
Define purpose, context, and photograph order without replacing the reference file.
The platform calculates file identity and keeps the material in a protected workflow.
Applicable methods record technical signals and limitations per image.
The team checks findings, context, screening status, and next steps.
Generate PDF or ZIP and, when needed, protected access to the technical record.
Verification methods
The combination of signals is more informative than a single check. Availability varies by file, purchased profile, and technical configuration.
Creates a cryptographic identity to verify later changes to the recorded file.
Documents embedded information when it exists and can be read.
Supports visual comparison and proximity checks between images.
Records a descriptive statistical measurement of file content.
Produces an auxiliary recompression-difference map for applicable images.
Observes structural markers that may deserve further review.
No material technical signal identified
The configured checks did not find a material signal for screening.
Review recommended
A signal deserves additional context, comparison, or professional review.
Inconclusive
Available data is not sufficient for a standalone technical reading.
Pricing
Both levels deliver complete, traceable analysis. Pro adds more detailed technical findings and an expanded presentation of case context and limitations.
Premium
$19
per report / batch
A complete technical report with batch organization, context, integrity records, and cautious observations.
See what is included
Pro
$29
per report / batch
A complete professional report with expanded technical findings, limitations, and case context.
See what is included
Protected technical record
The platform keeps the batch, analyses, and export records online. The team can consult document origin and control how it is shared.
Access code
••••••
Example of a secure link
https://tracedocket.net/reports/<token>
The report presents the conclusion, key findings, and limitations. Detailed technical analysis remains available online for up to five years or until the user deletes it.
Private files and reports remain scoped to the correct user and tenant.
Objects and records use access controls and temporary links when displayed.
An optional public link requires a separate access code and creates a time-limited session.
Report, batch, hashes, and export remain associated with the platform record.
Technical analysis or manual document?
A manual document may fit a simple matter, and a specialist remains essential when a result is contested. TraceDocket brings repeatable routines, traceability, and clear communication into a published price, reducing internal work without hiding limitations.
| Criterion | Manual analysis |
|---|---|
| Cost | Variable internal effort |
| Timing | Several hours, depending on the team |
| Intake | Files and context assembled manually |
| Technical tests | Depend on the person and tools |
| Communication | Text prepared individually |
| Traceability | Depends on local organization |
| Sharing | File sent directly |
| Review and scale | More work for each new set |
Swipe to view the next column and go back whenever you want.
*Operational estimate: timing varies with batch volume, queue, and analysis configuration. Human review may take longer.
Built for real legal work
Structure client photographs before review, filing, or specialist referral.
Keep images, descriptions, and technical observations together for more consistent operations.
Organize photo batches, record observations, and preserve a history for authorized teams.
Frequently asked questions
Not automatically. The platform analyzes technical indicators, context, and limitations to support a review of the image's legitimacy. An authenticity conclusion may require other evidence and professional evaluation.
The flow can record SHA-256, perceptual hash, EXIF metadata, entropy, ELA, and JPEG compression observations, plus external methods when configured and applicable.
Premium organizes the main technical findings. Pro adds per-item detail, supplied context, limitations, and next steps.
The document presents the screening conclusion, key findings, limitations, and next steps. Detailed technical analysis remains online for authorized access for up to five years or until the user deletes it.
Access uses an address such as https://tracedocket.net/reports/<token>. The document provides a six-digit code to open the report; the link can be revoked and issuing a new one invalidates the previous link.
Yes. Besides the export, a completed report may have a link protected by a separate code. Issuing a new link revokes the previous one.
These routines produce technical indicators to support a legitimacy review, not an automatic authenticity seal. Sensitive or disputed cases may require examination by a qualified expert and additional reference material.
When the matter requires a formal expert report, source attribution, sensor comparison, or a contestable professional conclusion, a qualified expert remains the appropriate path.
Processing usually takes a few hours to one day, depending on batch volume, queue, and analysis configuration. Special cases or human review may take longer.
Coming soon. We are preparing an optional review and signature by a qualified expert. The cost will be published when available; AI never creates or simulates a signature or professional opinion.
Start with one batch
Upload the original file, apply the compatible routines, and give your team a clearer technical basis for legal or expert review.